Model Accuracy » TransPac 2021 - Model Accuracy onboard 2nd place overall finisher! » 9/01/2021 8:29 am |
Model Accuracy » Issue w/ BARO » 5/31/2021 5:52 am |
voodoomatz... can you please email us your GRIBs and LOGs at support@modelaccuracy.com
I need to see that error first hand to understand what is going on there... thanks!
Model Accuracy » GFS Vs. NAM Vs. HRRR Vs. ICON - Who Was The Best Offshore California? » 5/31/2021 5:37 am |
=21pxWhich GRIB file do you usually trust the most when sailing offshore southern California?
Check out a recent analysis from a customer's offshore training session. The boat shared their analysis of weather forecast GRIB files on their journey from San Diego out to the synoptic pressure and back over a day and half of sailing approximately 300 miles.
Model Accuracy is a critical piece of onboard software which can help navigators learn which weather forecast model is performing the most accurate, and provide calibration trends withinin your routing software. Knowing the trend errors are critical to apply within Expedition routing software to ensure you are always routing with the most accurate GRIB file possible!
This analysis can be done real time while onboard to make better navigating decisions off the best performing weather forecast GRIB file!Model Accuracy % - the closer the performance line of the GRIB to the top of the graph the better. Here you can see none of the GRIBS correctly forecast the wind shadow behind the Island San Clemente, and once out into the synoptic pressure the SailDocs GFS was the clear winner!TWS Knots Plot - The thin black line is the boat instrument data for TWS. You can see only the HRRR correctly forecast the lee of San Clemente Island, but then the HRRR over predicted the TWS forecast once out in the significant pressure of the syncopic breeze. Once offshore, the GFS and NAM were the most accurate!TWS Error Knots - here one can see the NAM Model did the best job with a near zero error in its prediction once the boat entered the synoptic around 1000Z UTC. [img]
Model Accuracy » Getting started .. » 5/31/2021 5:12 am |
voodoomatz! I am so sorry to have not seen this post immediately! I will update my settings so any reply arrives to me right away.
- regarding the ? button, you are correct! Thank you for bringing that to my attention and we will update in the next release! I am so sorry I missed that in my testing review.
- regarding the select logs and models function, you are also correct. It would be handy if what you selected stayed selected in the top of those boxes, so we will adjust that right away as well.
- not being able to manually change the start and end times is unusual to me - are you trying to change the end times before or after you have a set of logs and gribs? or are you making your window of analysis closer together and inside the earliest and latest time available? If you are having trouble moving the end times around inside the maximum window of time thats and issue and lets hop on a zoom call to get it sorted so I can see it first hand, and report back to our programming team!
Thank you so much for your time and interest in making our software better. This was made by navigators FOR navigators to help you understand which source of weather to always trust the most.... and why!
we are lucky to have your feedback and again I apologize for the delay!
Vr,
Model Accuracy Support
Model Accuracy » v1.500 release » 4/05/2021 5:05 pm |
Version 1.500 has been released! Check out what's new below:
Improved User Interface and navigator selection!
We had a very busy winter of working with top level navigators and capitalizing on their feedback. The result is an even more friendly user interface with a host of new and improved features.
List of version 1.500 improvements:
Model Accuracy » 2021 Islands Race weather forecast GRIB file results » 3/24/2021 6:19 am |
Model Accuracy » PW GFS/EC gribs analyzed at North Head weather station - Sydney Harbor » 12/23/2020 4:39 am |
Navigators in Australia, we are so sorry to hear about the cancellation of this year's Sydney-Hobart race.
In the spirit of still being in "race-mode" we went ahead and ran an analysis of the Predict Wind GFS and EC forecasts against the North Head weather observation station near Sydney.
Model Accuracy has a "pre-race" function which allows GRIB files to be compared to weather stations, and we now support the file format of the AuBOM (Australian Bureau of Meteorology) wind observations. This means you can download the weather station log data and use that as the truth against your GRIB file forecasts to see what is the accuracy trend in your area.
Take a look below to learn the expect forecast errors are before one ever even heads out to sea!
We compared 2 days of weather instrument data to the PW EC and PW GFS forecasts. We found a significant trend of the TWS forecast being far above what actually occurred, by approximately 7 knots! Check out at the Model Accuracy error graph below of the GRIB forecasts plotted against the observed weather data from North Head weather station.
Below is the "Results" page of the mathematical and statistical analysis of the forecasts compared to the truth data of the observation station. Both GRIBs were actually similar in their errors of the TWS being 7 knots above and 17-20 degrees right of the observations. Model Accuracy provides exact calibration values to be entered into Expedition Sailing Software for optimal routing of a "corrected" GRIB file.
Here you can see the TWD error plot. A "perfect" forecast wou
Model Accuracy » INNOVSAIL Conference Statistical Analysis of Sailing Forecasts paper » 12/23/2020 4:32 am |
Nick, that is great insight and thank you for viewing our academic paper submission!
Regarding the GWD and GWS we will review that computation possibility. We aren't aware of a customer base that has complained about an inaccurate analysis in areas with significant current, but we definitely want to stay on the cutting edge of development and will review that right away! I do understand and hear your input there and will review immediately!
We will review the bilinear interpolation process and what that would do for the computation time. I imagine it may double it at a minimum, if not more as then it would need to scale the information. Meaning, if it was only 1/3 the way in-between two spaces it simply couldn't average the results but instead apply that scaling. I will review with the team and report back!
Thanks for your input! We are always trying to make life easier for Expedition users and appreciate the feedback.
Model Accuracy » INNOVSAIL Conference Statistical Analysis of Sailing Forecasts paper » 12/20/2020 5:06 am |
Model Accuracy » GFS & EC have 15 degree TWD forecast error @ Green Cape AUS! » 12/20/2020 4:20 am |
We used the AuBOM data to review the accuracy of the GFS and EC weather forecast at Green Cape Australia and found a significant forecast error of 15 degrees. The forecast was predicting 15 degrees right of what was actually captured by the weather station - sure would be handy to know that trend if you were approaching that geographical point!
check out the analysis tutorial video below: